The case of Gideon v. Wainwright established the right of indigent defendants to have a lawyer in criminal trials. This political cartoon gives an opinion about what has happened since the decision was made. "P_" (class period) and your first name and last initials
1. Who does the man represent?
2. Who does the woman represent?
3. What do you think is the message of the political cartoon?
4. Should indigent defendants be provided with an attorney at the public's expense? Why or why not?
(adapted from www.landmarkcases.org)
37 comments:
P2 GABRIEL A. DANIEL B.
1. An excellent lawyer
2. The poor
3. About being poor
4.
p.2 Briana Guzman&Savannah Gonzalez
1)The man represents Mr.Gideon
2)The woman represents Mr.Gideon
3)I think the cartoons message is that some lawers are not that good
4)The poor should be provided with an attorney because in the 5th amendment all trials must be fair.
P2 Mayra R
1.The man represents the lawyer.
2.The lady represents Gideon.
3.the message is that everyone has the right to get a lawyer no mader their money problems.
4.
p2 oscar o and joshua p
1.the guy represensts the lady!!
2.gideon v. wainwright!!
3.that the lady is poor!!
4.no because the lady is not accuse of nothing
P2 Javier M and Karol R
1. The man represents lawyers who is getting a cutback.
2. The woman represents the poor defendents who is being represented by the lawyer.
3. The message of the politcal cartoon is that lawyers are having cutbacks and that he is trying to give a good representation for the poor.
4.Yes because every defendent has the right to be provided by an attorney, if they can not provide themselves because that would be fair.
P2 Efrain T and Ramon R
1. The man represent's Wainwright
2.The women represent's Gideon
3.I think that the political cartoon gives an opinion about what has happen since the dicision was made
4.
Period:4 ITSEL P Yuliana B
1.The man represent the lady
2.The woman represent herself
3.The cartoon is telling use that when you dont hhave money the government well give you a lawyer
4.I think we should because it well provided that u did the crime
period 4 omar maya sol castillo 1. The man represents a lawyer.
2. The woman represents Gideon.
3. That even thought ur poor the courty or supreme court has to get you a lawyer ecuase its not a fiar trial if you dont have a lawyer.
4. No becuase they hae t get thier evidence by them selfs they cant have people to give evidence away from them.
p4 isael z and henra b i mean henry b and i dont want to change it
1.
p4 Oscar L/Anahi F
1.The man represents Miss Borden.
2.The women represents the poor.
3.Budget cuts hurt the people
4.No because they are not good
P4 mario duenas winevere duron
1.The man represents poor people or people who needs a defence
2.the woman represents people who need a defence
3.the message is that people who dont have money that are poor still need representatives.
P.4 Alize' G/Jonathan B.
1) The man represents Ms. Borden.
2) Poor people.
3) Budgetcuts hurt people.
4) No because they are not good.
period 4 lisa m. christian a.
1.the man represents mr. gideon.
2.the woman represents mr.gideon as well but she is there to support mr. gideon.
3.the message in the political cartoon is that sometimes its okay to make something complicated fun?
4.yes indigents defendants should be provided with an attorney at the publics expense because if it was someone else they would want an attorney to and its not fair not to have someone on your side just because you cant pay for it.
Celeste/Valerie per.4
This cartoon is when Gideon is getting his lawyer.
P.4 Destinie H. Caridad H.
1.The man represents the poor lady.
2.The woman represents the Perry Mason.
3.Even though the lady is poor she still gets a lawyer.
4.Yes, because even though they still get an attorney and a lawyer.
p4 isael z and henra b i mean henry b and i dont want to change it
1.
p4 alfredo c. , damiana a.
1. the man represents the public defence
2. the woman represnts for poor people
3. even though they dont have as much money they will still give you a lawyer to represent you.
4. indigent defendants should be provided with an anttorney because they made a law that every trail should be fair.
p4 lucy p. and isabella p.
1. it represents a lawyer
2. she represents the poor
3. this political cartoon gives an opinion about what has happened since the decision was made.
p4 lucy p. and isabella p.
1. it represents a lawyer
2. she represents the poor
3. this political cartoon gives an opinion about what has happened since the decision was made.
P.4 Brandonn.L
1.the man represents the womam
2.she represents the poor people
3.the government gives you a lawer if you dont have money.
p4 emily h. and nelly p.
HE represented Mr.Harris. The woman represents Mr. Gideon .We think the message they are trying to show us i that the poor that cant afford a lawyer has a right to an attorney.Emily h. thinks that the indigent should be given a lawyer because it wouldnt be fair for a person who knows nothing about defending him or her self to go against a professional lawyer. Nelly p. thinks that the state doesn't have to pay a lawyer for poor people
pe,6 brallan\alex
1.HE DEFENDS THE LAWYER
2.SHE REPRESENTS MR.GIDEON
3.THE CASE OF THAT SITUTION
4.NO AND I DONT KNOW WHY OKK
P6,Karmina M. Adriana P.
1. The man represents a public defender.
2.The woman represents a poor citizen.
Per6 Jonathan Gonzalez and Ricardo Marquina
1)He represent the women
2)She represent the poor
3)About free representives
4)No,because there free to represent people
P.6 Gabriela M. Juan M.
The man represents a public defender
The woman represents the poor people
The messaage is that the poor people shouldn't defend theirselves in court without a lawyer, it isn't fair . They are people and everyone should have their rights no matter what so if they are poor they should be given the right to have a free attorney no matter what.
They should be provided with an attorney if that were to be the case so it could be a fair case for both sides.
Per6 Jonathan Gonzalez and Ricardo Marquina
1)He represent the women
2)She represent the poor
3)About free representives
4)No,because there free to represent people
per.6 JoselineT.
1. the man represents the lawyer that is defending the poor lady.
2. the women represents the poor people that don't have money for a lawyer.
3. i think that the message of the cartoon is that the lawyers that the government provides are not really good because they cut their budget and there is not enough lawyers.
4.i think yes because the rules have to be fair and if they don't provide an attorney to them then they would not be fair.
period 6
Kimberly V & Julius IV
1. the man is a public defender
2. the women represents a poor defendants
3. the point the author is trying to make is that even though if there is no money in the government you still get an attorney
Salma L. And Edlin L.
1. The Public Defender (The Lawyer)
2. The Poor
3. They Give A Free Attorney To A Poor Person,
4. Yes , Because Everybody Deserves An Attorney Because It Wouldnt Be Fair If Only One Person Had One.
P.6 Leslie U. Krystal V.
1. The man represents the public defender.
2. The women represents poor defendant.
3. I think the message of the political cartoon is that justice cant be proven with only one person.
4. Yes, even though your poor u still have to have an attorney.
PER.6ANTHONY R. 1.THE MAN REPRESENTS A PUBLIC DEFENEDER WHICH IS A LAYER THAT DEFENDS POOR PEOPLE. 2.A POOR PERSON THAT CAN'T AFFORD A LAYER 3.TH MESSAGE OF THIS CARTOON IS THAT EVEN THOUGH YOUR POOR YOU CAN GET A LAYER.
period 6 juan salazar/ norma sanchez
1. The man represents a public deffender which is a lawyer.
2. A poor person that cant afford a lawyer.
3. The message means that there use to be more lawyers but with the cuts there is less and it affects it because there is less lawyers to represant the criminals in court; the criminals will always lose.
P.6 Oscar T. & Ivan R. -
1. The defender of the public.
2. The defendant of the poor.
3. It doesn't matter if there's no money in the government, you'll still get an attorney.
4. Yes because it wouldn't be fair if one side had an attorney and the other side didn't.
p2 Anahi S. & David S.
1. Business relation
2. Parties are dangerous
3. To use the governents money wisley
p:2 ruben jesus
1:the defender of the public.
2:the defendant of the poor.
3: it doesnt matter if theres no money in the goverment, youll still get an attorney.
4:yes because it wouldt be fair if one side had an attorney and the other side didnt
~Sol \(=^.^=)/ & omar(D&B)<33 P4
The foreign countries had as little political connection as possible.
2. That all this is good advice becuase its telling us that we dont wanna interferr with other country only want to trade and dont want to mess up partys and doesnt want to use alot of money to use a little bit of money as possibe.
Ipad
Post a Comment